Black Activists in Detroit Blame Democrats for Violence


Black activists got angry when the Detroit Police Chief James Craig called the people responsible for shooting 12 people on a playground killing one of them urban terrorists.  They complained about the insult and want him to apologize.  Craig refused to back down and stuck to his guns.

Craig said quite bluntly:

“You will allow this to continue if you do nothing. It must stop now.”

That’s when the president of the Detroit National Action Network (founded by Al Sharpton) Rev. Charles Williams took umbrage to Craig’s assertions that these thugs are urban terrorists:

“We want to make it very much known that the young people who are causing the violence in our community are not terrorists,” the activists said. “They are not urban terrorists, they are the products of bad urban policy.”

It’s good to see them put the blame squarely on the shoulders of the ones truly responsible for running the city into the ground, the democrats who have ruled Detroit for the past 50 plus years.  I guess they couldn’t see a way to blame it on George W Bush or ATM machines.  Detroit and Chicago (another democratic bastion of hell) have been competing for the most violent city in America and currently, it’s too close to call.  Chicago just reelected their democratic misfits and don’t believe for a moment Detroit will too because that’s what being a democratic voter is all about.

Craig reacted to Rev Williams by doubling down on his message:

“What should we call them? I say it’s urban terrorism and if it offends someone, I’m not worried about it. It is what it is.”

”And I say to the critics, when we were out there Sunday, I didn’t see any of them out of the grounds working with us side by side to come up with solutions … I’m sick and tired of dealing with the level of violence in some of our neighborhoods.”

Juvenile violence is so bad that Detroit has issued a curfew for minors from 6 PM to 6AM unless accompanied by a parent.




Thirteen Year Old CJ Pearson Rips Obama a New One on the Second Amendment (Video)


Georgia middle schooler,thirteen year old CJ Pearson is at it again.  He shot to stardom when he did a video explaining why Obama does not love America.    Then he went after Hillary Clinton and took her down.  Finally he did one on Al Sharpton, where he called him a waste of human flesh.

Now it’s Obama’s turn to feel CJ’s wrath over the second amendment: (This kid is great)


Republicans Vote to Enact New World Order


When republicans rolled over and played dead for Obama on fast tracking trade treaties, they did more than create a mechanism to circumvent the constitution, federal and state laws, and US sovereignty, they created the device in which to implement a one world government.  The TPP encompasses 40% of the world’s GDP by itself.  But the fast track bill will also include two other trade treaties, bringing the total to 90% and adding additional countries will be as simple as a vote among trading partners until the entire planet is covered under the treaties.

Here is the evaluation by Sen Jeff Sessions:

“It is essential that there be no misunderstanding: fast-track preapproves the formation of not only the unprecedentedly large Trans-Pacific Partnership, but an unlimited number of such agreements over the next six years. Those pacts include three of the most ambitious ever contemplated. After TPP comes the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the United States and the European Union, followed by the Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA), seeking as one its goals labor mobility among more than 50 nations. Together, these three international compacts encompass three-fourths of the world’s GDP. Including the nations whose membership is being courted for after enactment, the countries involved would encompass nearly 90 percent of global GDP. Yet, through fast-track, Congress will have authorized the President to ink these deals before a page of them has been made public. Then, the Executive sends Congress ‘implementing’ legislation to change U.S. law—legislation which cannot be amended, cannot be filibustered, and will not be subjected to the Constitutional requirement for a two-thirds treaty vote.”

(So, this is not even about the TPP treaty.  There are two other treaties and the six year time frame’s maximum.  The truth is Obama can push both of those through before he leaves office considering John Boehner’s 38% conservative rating. (CR)  Paul Ryan (CR 58%) lied to the American people before the vote was taken.  He claimed that TPP wasn’t even close to being ratified.  Bullshit.  The Australian Trade Director says that the deal is within a week from completion.  That six years isn’t written in stone either.  As now written it has a 6 year sunset in it but that can be easily removed or changed to 50 years.  The Founding Fathers were Skeptical of treaties with foreign countries.  They demanded no treaty be ratified without a 2/3 vote of the Senate, which this bill could never achieve.)

“According to the European Commission, the TiSA agreement—which most House and Senate members did not know about when they voted—will follow in the footsteps of the WTO’s Trade in Services Provisions, which has already inhibited the U.S. from making needed immigration changes. The European Commission says the EU ‘wants as many countries as possible to join the agreement.’ We have already seen how the EU has curtailed sovereignty in Europe; we do not want to follow in its footsteps.”

“This nation has never seen an agreement that compares to the TPP, which forms a new Pacific Union. This is far more than a trade agreement, but creates a self-governing and self-perpetuating Commission with extraordinary implications for American workers and American sovereignty.

“Such a historic international regulatory Commission should never be fast-tracked, and should never be put on a path to passage until every word has been publicly scrutinized, every question answered, and every last power understood by Congress and the American people.”

Now, it gets complicated.  You see the TPP bill has 29 chapters but only 5 deal with trade.  The other 24 deal with such things as immigration, which we would no longer have control over within the partnership and Climate Change we also would no longer have any control over.  The partnership agreement makes all partners equals.  Therefore the US president who leads 320 million people, has a vote exactly with the Sultan of Brunei who rules a mere 417,000 people.  That means the extreme minority will rule over the vast majority.  This redistribution of wealth to the extreme.

The trade agreements will also basically force us into the European Union, which is a mess.  Remember when Greece almost went bankrupt, Germany had to step in and provide tens of billions of dollars in addition to what they received by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  Now Greece refuses to live up to their agreement and it could affect every country in the EH and the euro valuation.  Do we really want to get involved?

Listen up people, with the advent of these treaties we are no longer the land of the free.  Our destiny rests with every dinky third world country on the planet.  To believe otherwise, you must put your faith in Obama and the biggest RINOs known to man.




The Administration and Race

Obama became President promising a “fundamental transformation” of these United States. In that, he was successful. We have records numbers on welfare, the h9ighest debt in the nations history, and a large part of our citizens, black or white that have left the workforce. We have Obamacare, about one sixth of our economy pushed through in reconciliation, a process not meant to make law, but to fine tune the budget. His arrogance in the abuse of his power has lead to an uncertainty in this country, an integral part of the Cloward-Piven Strategy that he has followed.  The waivers unilaterally imposed by Obama of the Affordable Care Act, without the consultation of Congress shows a deep disrespect both for Congress and foe the people of this country.

All this, and many more examples show that Obama has no respect for the rule of law, and that his “pen and phone” executive orders make a  mockery of the rule of law, both foreign and here at home.  That Obama is a President intent on dividing this country is obvious, He has pummeled the country with the evil he sees in the rich, pursued class warfare to the extent that the middle class is quickly eroding due to higher taxes, Obamacare, heavy regulation, and a lack caring about the difficulties of small business. No where has this divisi0n been pushed harder than on the subject of race.

There has been a degradation of race relations in this country. After the turbulent 1960’s the seventies and eighties were times of reasonable interaction between the races. The entire “black is beautiful” culture was uplifting for both black and whites. There were certainly times of challenges, but it did seem to me that things were moving forward.

Racism, unfortunately, will always be with us, on both sides of the racial divide. To say that blacks can’t be racist is  is at best untruthful, at worst, just another way to try and end the discussion. Whites are afraid of being called a racist, and many people, including college professors say things like ” Voter ID is Racist” and “There are no good white people, only less bad white people”.  These are the same professors that would be up in arms if the roles were reversed, and a white person said that about a black. White guilt, for me anyway, is a joke. I have nothing to be guilty of, and “white privilege” is just another excuse for not helping yourself.” I don’t think much of the latest buzzword “microagression” either. A Rutgers Professor, the one of “only less bad white people claim above, claims that “whiteness plays an invisible role in dominating and oppressing everyone else.” This from a professor who class thus summer is “Politicizing Beyonce. Most of the whites I know, don’t oppress anyone. They just want to be left alone to go to work, and live the lives they have set out for themselves.

Throughout my military career, I have served with people of all colors, and creeds, all religions. All work together well, possibly because of the military standards that are set, and because we knew what was expected of us. There were some serious challenges in the military in the late 70’s. but by the middle 80’s  things were pretty much running smoothly as far as race relations. There were still those that claimed racism was prevalent, and they they were being kept down by ” the white man”.  I found that most of those like that did as little as possible, and didn’t last long in the military. I also found that the number of whites who did as little as possible were the same, but they didn’t have race to fall back on.

To finish let me say this. I have been in situations where I have buried friends. I know the pain of losing someone you love, and the futility of asking why. There have been many cases of whites killing blacks, both those in authority and without, and it is something that needs to be worked out. Why , if  black lives matter, were there 13 black on black killings in Chicago this weekend, 12 in Baltimore, and how many others. That is unacceptable to me as well, why is it not mentioned by the balck activists who want to condemn whites? This in not 1950, Jim Crow is dead, and to be honest “whitey” is not racist and just wants to get on with his life. I know it is the black activists intention to disrupt that, and it starts with the administration, run by a black man, doing his best to foster disrespect and fear on both sides. We are better than that.

Hillary Promises to Raise “Revenue Enhancements” (Taxes to Us Little Folks)

U.S. presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton listens to small business owners as she campaigns for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination at Capital City Fruit in Norfolk, Iowa April 15, 2015.  Clinton, who announced on Sunday that she is running for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, drove to Iowa to begin campaigning for president. REUTERS/Rick Wilking - RTR4XHNQ
U.S. presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton listens to small business owners as she campaigns for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination at Capital City Fruit in Norfolk, Iowa April 15, 2015. Clinton, who announced on Sunday that she is running for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, drove to Iowa to begin campaigning for president. REUTERS/Rick Wilking – RTR4XHNQ

In one of her first platforms in her race for president, Hillary has proposed universal preschool for all children in the country.  This amounts to daycare since the children would be ages three and four.  Currently 46% of children ages three and four attend preschool.  That leaves an additional 54% or about 4,428,000 not attending as of 2013.  Now let me explain the language.  Universal means mandatory.  Parents would no longer have a choice in whether to send their three year olds to school.  Currently it costs $10,615 for every preschooler.  That comes out to 47 billion dollars per year.  How does she pay for it?  She’s not clear on that but she does say it would require “revenue enhancements” which is a way to avoid saying new taxes.

Her husband Bill used the phrase “contributions” as if it was voluntary.  It is safe to say that it would not be fully funded by the federal government.  Obama did propose universal preschool paid by the federal government at a cost of 75 billion a year.  State and local governments would need to pony up a portion of the costs.  That would require an increase in sales taxes, property taxes and state income taxes.  This would replace Head Start which has been almost universally criticized as ineffective and not cost to benefit efficient by both liberals and conservatives.

So, why is preschool such a big deal?  Simple.  If we add 4,428,000 students, we would need at least 184,500 new teachers.  Each teacher averages $687 dollars a year in dues.    That comes out to $126,751,500, a large portion of which would be kicked back to the democrats.  Also, three and four year olds are extremely impressionable, so liberals can start with them early and teach them how to cross dress and that homosexuality is normal or any number of liberal agenda priorities.  last but not least, preschool is a baby sitting group for working parents.  Since the “revenue enhancements” are not seen by taxpayers, they feel it is free.  But nothing is free.  It is paid for by hidden taxes.

Look for more liberal programs from Hillary, paid for by “revenue enhancements.”