Posted on May 18, 2013 in Liberal Kryptonite | 0 comments

Take your pick. Both fit. But before you judge him too harshly, remember that he is a liberal and as such is forced to defend his party and his president or suffer the consequences. Here is a recent statement made by Cummings:
“After falsely accusing former Secretary Clinton of lying to Congress, falsely accusing the White House of deliberately misleading the American people, and falsely accusing the military of withholding critical assistance on the night of the attacks, the Chairman is now accusing Admiral Mullen, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Ambassador Pickering, a seven-time U.S. ambassador, of being complicit in a cover-up.”
Let’s break this down, shall we? “After falsely accusing former Secretary Clinton of lying to Congress”
In her testimony, Clinton claimed that she did not know anything about the Benghazi embassy requesting security. It was revealed that she signed off on a memo scaling back security at the Benghazi embassy. Here is part of page 7 of the congressional report:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
An ongoing Congressional investigation across five House Committees concerning the events surrounding the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Libya has made several determinations to date, including:
â— Reductions of security levels prior to the attacks in Benghazi were approved at the highest levels of the State Department, up to and including highest levels of the State Department, up to and including Secretary Clinton. This fact contradicts her testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on January 23, 2013.
â— In the days following the attacks, White House and senior State Department officials altered accurate talking points drafted by the Intelligence Community in order to protect the State Department.
â— Contrary to Administration rhetoric, the talking points were not edited to protect classified information. Concern for classified information is never mentioned in email traffic among senior Administration officials.
These preliminary findings illustrate the need for continued examination and oversight by the five House Committees. The Committees will continue to review who exactly was responsible for the failure to respond to the repeated requests for more security and for the effort to cover up the nature of the attacks, so that appropriate officials will be held accountable.
She denied knowing about the scaling back of security. She signed an order scaling back security. Rational people would see this as a lie. Cummings isn’t rational, he’s a liberal.
“falsely accusing the White House of deliberately misleading the American people”
Obama and his people kept pushing the story that the attack was because of an Internet movie, even though Gregory Hicks and intelligence knew right away it was terrorism. In order to push his false narrative, Obama’s White House and State Department had to cut 3 out of 4 paragraphs from the CIA talking points. All told, they removed 248 of the 348 words in the report. He also claimed that they had no resources to go in with. FEST was ready willing and able to move, so was a group in Tripoli.
Rational people would see this as a lie. Cummings isn’t rational, he’s a liberal.
“falsely accusing the military of withholding critical assistance on the night of the attacks”
In a previous post, I described how FEST was packing and ready to go in. They were not sent. The only man in America authorized to issue a stand down order is the Commander in Chief. Gregory Hicks testified that Lt Steve Gibson was in Tripoli, ready to go to relieve the Benghazi embassy. He was told to stand down. But according to spokesperson, Major Rob Firman, they weren’t ordered to stand down, they were merely told not to board the plane. Sounds like they are picking fly shit out of the pepper in the Pentagon.
Rational people would see this as a lie. Cummings isn’t rational, he’s a liberal.
”Chairman is now accusing Admiral Mullen, the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Ambassador Pickering, a seven-time U.S. ambassador, of being complicit in a cover-up.”
Let’s look at the facts. Who is Thomas Pickering? Here is an article I did when he was first announced as the lead investigator. You will notice he got the results I predicted. They didn’t even question Hillary. That’s probably because you never ask questions you don’t want the answer to. We do know that Hillary spoke to Greg hicks shortly after the attack began. Did they question Obama? No. So the two central characters in this Obamanation were never questioned. How special!!
Rational people would see this as a lie. Cummings isn’t rational, he’s a liberal.
So my conclusion is that Cummings lied about republicans lying about the lies the liberals told. Got that?
Recent Comments